Login
iscover
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles has released its response to the joint standing committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade’s inquiry into international armed conflict decision making.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The decision to deploy Australian combat forces is the most serious decision for any Australian leader, with the last examples being as contentious as they were serious – Afghanistan and Iraq – in response to mounting political pressure the Albanese government has formally responded to the joint standing committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade’s inquiry into international armed conflict decision making.
The Albanese government’s official statement recognises that “Australians should be assured that their Parliament has an important role in debating matters of national importance, including Australia’s involvement in international armed conflict”.
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister, the Hon Richard Marles said, “Sending our Defence Force personnel into international armed conflict is the most consequential decision a government can make and is never taken lightly.”
The response agrees-in-principle or broadly agrees with the report’s seven recommendations. The government also welcomes the principal finding that decisions regarding armed conflict are fundamentally a prerogative of the executive.
As part of its response, the government has:
- Agreed to the establishment of a new joint statutory committee on defence, with further work to be undertaken to determine implementation details;
- Agreed that a ministerial statement be given in both Houses of Parliament to inform a timely debate on the decision by the executive to engage in major military operations as a party to an armed conflict; and
- Agreed that debate in both Houses of Parliament should occur at the earliest opportunity.
“This report and the government’s response rightly affirms that this remains a decision for the executive, but that it is important that Parliament has effective mechanisms to examine and debate such decisions,” Marles added.
The government also reaffirms its commitment to improving openness and accountability, and ensuring Parliament has effective mechanisms to examine and debate such decisions.
In recognition of this and balancing transparency with timely decision making, the government has agreed to codify practices relating to informing the Parliament about these decisions.
