Login
iscover
DST scientists have conducted a range of research to limit the impact of concussive brain injuries on soldiers travelling in armoured vehicles.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Soldiers in vehicles subjected to underbelly blasts can sustain serious head and neck injuries caused by their head impacting the interior roof of the vehicle.
DST's Dr Melanie Franklyn, an expert in the biomechanics of injury, wanted to determine if retrofitting foam padding to the upper interior of the cabin could help mitigate the risk of serious injury.
"When an IED detonates beneath a vehicle, the blast doesn't always breach the vehicle's hull. Instead, the force of the blast can deform the structure of the vehicle, propelling the occupants upwards and into the roof with considerable force," Dr Franklyn explains.
Brain injury acquired through military service is a concern for Australia and its allies, with a number of returned service men and women suffering some form of traumatic brain injury, typically caused by a motor vehicle accident, gunshot wound, fall or improvised explosive device. Such injuries can result in short or long-term memory loss, changes in behaviour, poor balance, dizziness and confusion; or in the most severe cases, death.
Aware that very few military vehicles have interior padding on the roof, Dr Franklyn wanted to determine if this relatively straightforward measure could make an impact on the risk of serious injury.
"We found that foam padding actually had negligible effect on the potential for head injury, however wearing [a] helmet was critical in preventing a serious injury or fatality. Our aim was to determine if retrofitting energy absorbing foam to the interior of the roof could mitigate serious head and neck injury, and what effect wearing a military helmet would have," Dr Franklyn added.
Using test equipment provided by Holden Australia modified to accurately replicate the unique 'underbelly' blast effects, Dr Franklyn and her team tested three foams at five different velocities, conducting the tests with a headform both wearing and not wearing a military helmet.
Through their research, Dr Franklyn and her team were able to determine the impact velocities that are likely to result in serious head injury and identify how many impacts a helmet (either the helmet shell or the padding) could be subjected to before it loses its protective qualities.
Dr Franklyn explained, "This data gives us a good indication of what blast magnitudes are significant in terms of causing serious traumatic brain injury, which helps in the development of protective measures such as the optimisation of helmet design for blunt impacts."
Knowledge of the thresholds also enables new vehicle standards to be developed to prevent serious brain injury.
