Lockheed Martin passes design milestone for next US Space Force comms satellite
Lockheed Martin has proven the readiness of its satellite design for the US Space Force’s upcoming Mobile User Objective Sys...
Anduril, Microsoft to partner on US Army visual augmentation capability
Microsoft and Anduril Industries have expanded their partnership to drive the next phase of the US Army’s Integrated Visual ...
Japan’s 2024 industrial policy: A bold strategy to strengthen the defence industrial base
Opinion: Late last year, the Japanese government unveiled a landmark policy, developed by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Indus...
$272m contract to enhance Army’s long-range fires
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles and Defence Industry and Capability Delivery Minister Pat Conroy have an...

Congressional review flags Virginia Class delays, cost pressures

Congressional review flags Virginia Class delays, cost pressures

Cost and schedule risks linked to the construction of Block V Virginia Class submarines have been detailed in a newly published report.

Cost and schedule risks linked to the construction of Block V Virginia Class submarines have been detailed in a newly published report.

A new Congressional Research Services report has flagged issues relating to the United States Navy’s Virginia Class Attack submarine procurement program, which include the force-level goal and procurement rate, industrial-base challenges, and cost and schedule risks.

The report has noted a total of 36 Virginia Class submarines have been procured by the US Navy since the program commenced in 1998, at a rate of approximately two platforms per year.

However, the review references findings from a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report published last month, which noted delays in the construction of Block V Virginia Class submarines.

“Over the past year, work on Block V submarines fell further behind schedule and construction costs continued to grow above original targets due to overall higher workforce demand and additional factors such as correspondingly less experienced workers,” the GAO observed.

According to the Congressional report, these workforce constraints could be attributed to the simultaneous construction of Columbia Class ballistic missile submarines.

“The Navy’s prioritisation of the Columbia Class submarine relative to the Virginia Class submarine exacerbated the effect of these workforce trends for Virginia Class construction,” the report noted.

“The same companies build both submarine classes and have been challenged to meet both programs’ increasing workforce needs.

“Program officials reported that the shipbuilders added more workers to the Columbia Class construction efforts than the Virginia Class, contributing to delays on the Virginia Class submarines.”

As a result, program officials reportedly expect the first three Block V submarines to be delivered behind schedule, with additional cost increases and schedule delays “likely”.

The Pentagon currently estimates each Block V Virginia Class vessel, equipped with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM), would cost an estimated US$3.6 billion (AU$5.2 billion).

“The Navy’s current cost and schedule projections may be optimistic because they assume a significant amount of improvement in construction efficiency that has yet to be achieved, and the Columbia Class’ growing staffing needs continue to add risk for the Virginia Class,” the report adds.

These findings come amid concern regarding the delivery timeline for Australia’s future fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, promised under the AUKUS agreement.

Along with the UK’s Astute Class Vessel, the Virginia Class submarine is being considered for selection by the Commonwealth government’s Nuclear Submarine Taskforce.

The Congressional report casts doubt over former defence minister and federal leader of the opposition Peter Dutton’s recent call for off-the-shelf purchases of two Virginia Class submarines before 2030, ahead of the local construction of a subsequent eight vessels.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles has dismissed the suggestion, conceding delivery of a nuclear-powered submarine to the Royal Australian Navy before 2030 was “extremely optimistic”.

A government decision on a future RAN SSN platform is expected in March next year.  

[Related: The nuclear submarine builders must be consulted by the task force ]

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!